Physical constraints lead to parallel evolution of micro- and nanostructures of animal adhesive pads: a review

• Thies H. Büscher and
• Stanislav N. Gorb

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2021, 12, 725–743, doi:10.3762/bjnano.12.57

• might be potentially interesting for engineers as a kind of optimal solution by nature, the biomimetic implications of the discussed results are briefly presented. Keywords: adhesion; attachment devices; biomechanics; convergence; friction; substrate compliance; Review Animal attachment systems

Aquatic versus terrestrial attachment: Water makes a difference

• Petra Ditsche and
• Adam P. Summers

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2014, 5, 2424–2439, doi:10.3762/bjnano.5.252

• faced by tires on roads of varying roughness and wetness has driven the development of theories that may be applicable to biological systems [50][51]. These theories are difficult to assess in a biological context, but an examination of the parameters, surface roughness, substrate compliance, friction

A nanometric cushion for enhancing scratch and wear resistance of hard films

• Katya Gotlib-Vainshtein,
• Olga Girshevitz,
• Chaim N. Sukenik,
• David Barlam and
• Sidney R. Cohen

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2014, 5, 1005–1015, doi:10.3762/bjnano.5.114

• performs better than the titania on the Si substrate (Figure 4). These results suggest the beneficial influence of a softer substrate in improving the scratch resistance of the titania films. We refer to this as a “cushioning effect”. Taking the Young's modulus as a measure of the substrate compliance

• runs, and is included in the force balance. Figure 10 depicts the deformation and stress profiles resulting from the FEA model. These mappings give a good insight as to how the substrate compliance influences the behavior. With the stiffer silicon substrate the deformation is localized and small